Analysis of Act IV scene 1, in three different versions of The Merchant Of Venice Essay Example

Analysis of Act IV scene 1, in three different versions of The Merchant Of Venice Essay Example Analysis of Act IV scene 1, in three different versions of The Merchant Of Venice Paper Analysis of Act IV scene 1, in three different versions of The Merchant Of Venice Paper Essay Topic: Merchant Of Venice Play Act IV scene 1 is an intense scene in the play where we see many of the plays main themes such as justice and mercy, money and status, revenge, loyalty, love and prejudice and tolerance. Shakespeare presents a harsh character in Shylock the Jew, but the fact that he also gives him the chance to speak more than any other European playwright preceding him would suggest that his portrayal is not conventional but much more complex for example in his words in Act III scene 1, lines 57-58: I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions? Much of Shakespeares enduring appeal has been in his amazing portrayal of the complexities of the human condition for example Hamlet or Macbeth. Traditionally Jews were the evil villains of Elizabethan drama, frequently Machiavellian or greedy but unlike his contemporaries Shakespeares characters were never simply good or evil but embody the complex mix within each of us that makes us human. The main dilemma in staging this play today is in the consideration of Shakespeares possible anti-semitism and/or sympathies towards his character and indeed whether Shylock only represents the Jewish people or whether he is symbolic of oppression of minority races in general. Through Shylocks forced conversion in this scene we are reminded of the conversions of other religions according to the ruler of the time such as Henry VIII. This would suggest that Shakespeare is using Shylock as more than a symbol of Jewishness. In this piece of coursework I will be examining mainly how sympathetic or unsympathetic the various versions seem to be and how each Director has succeeded in making the character of Shylock worthy of Shakespeares realism. Jews were traditionally viewed as outsiders and were not citizens. Christians as far back as the 11th century could not lend money without interest and many Jews earned a living from this profession as they could not join the artisan guilds. As they became their own debt collectors they soon became the target of resentment. A myth was born; with which Shakespeares audience would have been familiar, of ritual murder or blood libel that Jews would kill adult Christians. It is to this myth to which Shakespeare seems to allude in the pound of flesh incident in this scene. Shakespeare is original in showing us the extent to which Shylock is oppressed by Christians surrounding him and it is through this that Shakespeare succeeds in drawing out sympathy from his audience. Analysis of Act IV scene 1 In the text of Act IV scene 1 before we meet Shylock he is described as a stony adversary, an inhuman wretch, incapable of pity, void and empty from any dram of mercy. Antonio describes Shylocks spirit as being full of tyranny and rage. When Shylock enters into the scene the Duke challenges him saying The world thinks, and I think so too, that thou but leadest this fashion of thy malice To the last hour of act, and then tis thought Thoult show thy mercy and remorse more strange than is thy strange apparent cruelty. At this point the audience is immediately drawn into the suspense of the scene. The Duke speaks for everyone in hoping that Shylock will back down. The combination of the Dukes speech on mercy and his hope for a gentle answer with Shylocks contemptuous reply serves to further provoke the audience. Calling Shylock Jew instead of using his name also manipulates the audiences reactions into thinking of the stereotype rather than the individual. At this point the Duke says Let him stand before our face suggests Shylock should stand centre stage for this speech. Shylocks reply to the Duke and onlookers is so long winded that he immediately loses favour. This speech would be effective if he was standing up as he speaks about his values. It is a central point in the scene as it is his first opportunity to defend himself but he does not elicit sympathy from his onlookers. He is instead twisting, evasive and difficult: So can I give no reason, nor I will not, more than a lodged hatred and a certain loathing I bear Antonio. He ends this key speech in his defence with an open admission of his hatred. His illustrations of animals, later paralleled in Antonios speech, are deliberately offensive. He plays with the words of Bassanio, twists them and turns them back on the speaker providing a quickfire dialogue which builds up the tension from the outset. The repeated references to the Jew suggest an element of anti-semitism. The imagery of the wolf and the lamb is very effective as it evokes both blood lust for an innocent creature and also the key theme of religion in the form of the lamb of God. His Jewish heart again evokes the stereotype of the unfeeling moneylender. The Dukes repeated pleas for mercy, a key theme in the scene, serve only to enforce Shylocks determination to have exactly what he is owed: the pound of flesh. Ironically this steadfast and unrelenting desire to have his bond is what ultimately results in his downfall at the end of the scene. There is a certain irony in Shylocks swearing on our holy Sabbath to have his bond as God teaches forgiveness. His demand of What judgement shall I dread, doing no wrong? conveys his arrogance as he seems utterly convinced of being in the right. When Shylock challenges his onlookers as to their treatment of slaves, this could suggest a defence of those oppressed and support the view that Shakespeares position was not only pro-Jewish but more globally in support of oppressed minorities in general. The climax of Shylocks claim is spoken with great force and evokes some sympathy finally when he alludes to how the pound of flesh is dearly bought. I would exploit this line as a key point in his speech. When he demands the fatal reply from the Court it is ironic as it is the intricacies of the law of Venice which eventually condemns him. He could conceivably be holding his bond in his hand at this stage for maximum visual impact. Bassanios words The Jew shall have my flesh, blood, bones and all are somewhat reminiscent of Shylocks earlier words in Act III scene I: I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions? His reference to one drop of blood also sets the scene for what will unfold and heightens the audiences suspense as to a possible blood libel. Gratianos pun on sole and soul indicate for us how Shylock is sharpening his knife. At this point sympathy for Shylock must be at its lowest as he does indeed come across as having bloody and ravenous desires and he again seems to dismiss Bassanios words with contempt. Antonio and Bassanio must surely end this section feeling thoroughly pessimistic. Their speech would surely be filled with tension and a desperate sense of urgency. With Portias arrival, however, the mood immediately lightens. As a symbol of Christianity her determined pleas for mercy provide hope for a more positive outcome and compel the audience further. Even Portia refers initially to Shylock as the Jew. Her lyrical and moving speech regarding the quality of mercy dropping as the gentle rain from heaven contrasts sharply with Antonios earlier speech on Shylocks lack of mercy: You may as well forbid the mountain pines to wag their high tops and to make no noise when they are fretten with the gusts of heaven. It also contrasts with Shylocks short punctuated sentences. When Portia suggests that Shylock will be blessed in return for showing mercy it is loaded with irony as at the end he is granted mercy regardless of not having done the same. Shylocks patience seems to be running out when he challenges Portias words: My deeds upon my head, I crave the law, the penalty and forfeit of my bond. I imagine this said with controlled anger. Throughout this speech Shylock remains determined and unmoved. He continues to make religious references and begins to compliment Portia on her apparent wisdom. He recites passages from his bond one imagines in a tone of expectation at things going his way. When Bassanio and Gratiano speak with great emotion of their own wives whom they would sacrifice for Antonios sake, their words are contrasted with Shylocks to great effect: I have a daughter. This for the first time really underlines the pain that Shylock has been caused and shows that rather than being a man incapable of emotion, that he too has suffered greatly and that this is at the root of his determination to have what he is rightfully owed. The change in mood at this point makes Portias verdict even more shocking and sudden. Ironically Shylock who seemed earlier to know every word of his bond now seems somewhat uncertain for the first time as Portia recites the word of the law to him: Is that the law? He then persists in d emanding the bond thrice and seems suddenly unsettled, edgy and in a hurry to depart. This is conveyed through his short, punctuated speech. Towards the end of the scene in a dramatic and ironic role reversal we see Shylock begging for his livelihood and his life: Nay, take my life and all, pardon not that. You take my house, when you do take the prop That doth sustain my house; you take my life, When you do take the means whereby I live. His poignant words I am content in reply to the verdict granted by the Court I imagine being said with utmost humility. His claims of being not well could elicit sympathy from the audience. We are reminded here of him as not only being a cantankerous man but primarily an old man, fragile and ephemeral like other humans. It is on this note that Shakespeare chooses to herald Shylocks exit. Discussion of version 1 The Channel 4 television version was produced and directed by Alan Horrox and starred Bob Peck as Shylock and Benjamin Whitrow as Antonio. This version was very traditional it was set in Venice in the sixteenth century and was filmed both in studio (Millennium studios) and on location in Venice. Music is also used in this version both during Portias speech on mercy and again when Shylock is going to cut Antonio this adds to the suspense of the scene. This version portrays Shylock in parts as a harsh character for whom you would show less sympathy. He is portrayed as a haughty character and points his finger at Antonio saying The pound of flesh which I demand of him is dearly bought, tis mine and I will have it. In a later part of the scene his haughty attitude is reinforced when he is again asked to show mercy he replies On what compulsion must I? Tell me that. Close up camera work was used effectively at this point. Shylocks character changes when he feels things are going his way, he grovels to Portia and praises her, he has a look of pleasure on his face when he unsheathes his knife and is ready to cut Antonio. When Shylock is about to cut Antonio he notices that he has a cross around his neck and so he pushes it over his shoulder demonstrating his dislike of Christianity. However, his attitude changes to one of shock when Portia stops him. From this point onward one is inclined to feel sorry for Shylock as he goes from being quite wealthy to losing everything because of his own stubborn attitude and lack of sympathy. At the very end of the scene when Shylock is on his knees you are inclined to feel sympathetic towards him. Discussion of version 2 Trevor Nunn directed this version and it starred Henry Goodman as Shylock and David Bamber as Antonio. It was filmed at Pinewood Studios. The setting was very stark with most actors wearing dark suits and it was set in the 1920s in between the two World Wars. Through this version we see the many different sides to Shylocks character. At the start of the scene he appears as an old man who has difficulty in walking which elicits a little sympathy. However, Shylocks character is strong and when he is insisting on his bond the previous feeling of sympathy changes to one of abhorrence. His dislike of both Christianity and Antonio is noted early in the scene by his facial expression when he states, More than a lodged hate and a certain loathing I bear Antonio, that I follow thus. Antonio further emphasises Shylocks Jewishness when he states As seek to soften that than which whats harder? His Jewish heart. here showing how Shylock is viewed as hard hearted. Feelings change again when Shylock says with regard to his daughter dearly bought as this evokes sympathy for him and close up camera work is used effectively at this point. Shylock speaks with anger refusing to show mercy and insisting on his bond. When Bassanio said Yes, here I tender it for him in the court, Yea, twice the sum, if that will not suffice, I will be bound to pay it ten times oer On forfeit of my hands, my head, my heart. If this will not suffice, it must appear That malice bears down truth applause was used effectively to show support for Antonio and to isolate Shylock. Shylock goes on to appear very happy and excited at the prospect of receiving his bond. However, when the tables are turned he is stubborn and refuses to beg for mercy this could evoke anti-semitic feelings as he is portrayed standing alone while Antonio has the support of his Christian friends. Although Shylock remained seated at the end I still felt sorry for him as he looked old and frail especially when he removed his Jewish hat and cloth placing them on the scales as he left. Discussion of version 3 This version was directed for television by John Sichel and starred Laurence Olivier as Shylock, Anthony Nichols as Antonio. The actors all wore Victorian costumes and the setting was like a board meeting with all in attendance sitting round it and the furniture was very ornate. This created a highly pressurised environment. Shylock was more confident and walked round the table, his voice was strong and facial expressions were used effectively to portray his emotions. Again we see the confident, stubborn man in early scenes when Shylock is demanding his bond. He shows his disgust and hatred of Antonio both by his facial expression and tone of voice, when he says a certain loathing I bear Antonio. He shows his confidence in his demands when he walks about saying What judgement shall I dread, doing no wrong? His feelings show pleasure as he smiles when sharpening his knife to cut his pound of flesh. He speaks with great arrogance when he says, On what compulsion must I? showing his determination to have what is owed. There is sarcasm in his voice when he refers to Christian husbands willing to sacrifice their wives for Antonio by saying These be the Christian husbands. The lighting was impressive throughout the scene and there was effective close up camera work during Portias speech, for example, when she said, It blesseth him that gives, and him that takes. and also when Shylock made the statement I have a daughter because this focused on Shylocks suffering for the first time.. In this version Shylock is a more arrogant character. He raises his voice and gets extremely angry and looks shocked and surprised when he asks the question Is that the law? At the very end of the scene you feel sorry for Shylock, as he seems old, fragile and weak. He looks as though he has lost everything in the world and he has to hold onto a pillar for support. He falls to the ground and is helped out of the room. The scene ends with just the sound of Shylock crying outside which is very effective as it emphasises his isolation. Comparison of versions and personal opinions Although all three versions told exactly the same story they all had very different settings and portrayed Shylock in a slightly different way although each one elicited sympathy for him. The Channel 4 version was very colourful and used traditional Shakespearean costumes. Lighting and music were used effectively and the setting gave the impression of a real courtroom. I felt some sympathy for Shylock in this version The Trevor Nunn version was simplistic, with most actors dressed in dark suits. It gave me the impression of rival mafia style gangs. The final version, which was done by the National Theatre Company, was my favourite. Laurence Olivier portrayed Shylock as a strong confident character who moved around the room making him appear more arrogant than in the other two versions but also eliciting sympathy. I felt this version was the best as it succeeded in conveying the complexities of Shylocks character. We saw both arrogance and frailty and I thought it conveyed the story as Shakespeare was trying to put it across in the text.